<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Offices of J. Whitfield Larrabee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.larrabeelaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.larrabeelaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eight Favorable Laws In The Plaintiffs&#8217; Toolbox</title>
		<link>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2010/08/14/eight-favorable-laws-in-the-plaintiffs-toolbox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2010/08/14/eight-favorable-laws-in-the-plaintiffs-toolbox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Misconduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrabeelaw.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Studies suggest that juries most often return verdicts in favor of tort defendants in Massachusetts. But, Massachusetts plaintiffs and their lawyers have some laws for which they can be thankful. Laws providing for strict liability, multiple or punitive damages, 12% prejudgment interest and attorney&#8217;s fees help to balance the scales of justice. PREJUDGMENT INTEREST G.L. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Studies suggest that juries most often return verdicts in favor of tort defendants in Massachusetts. But, Massachusetts plaintiffs and their lawyers have some laws for which they can be thankful. Laws providing for strict liability, multiple or punitive damages, 12% prejudgment interest and attorney&#8217;s fees help to balance the scales of justice.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
<strong>PREJUDGMENT INTEREST</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
G.L. ch. 231 sec. 2B, providing prejudgment interest at the rate of 12% per year, is perhaps the most plaintiff friendly law in Massachusetts. Because most civil cases in Superior Court take at least 3 or 4 years to reach trial, this law punishes defendants for delaying the resolution of cases that are found to have merit and compensates plaintiffs who are forced to wait long for justice.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
<strong>CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Chapter 93A, Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, has broad application to unfair and deceptive business practices. With its provision for up to treble damages, plus attorney&#8217;s fees to prevailing plaintiff&#8217;s, this law has juice, especially in cases involving more than one defendant. Where more than one defendant violates ch. 93A, each defendant is potentially liable for a separate award of punitive damages. International Fidelity Insurance Company v. Wilson, 387 Mass. 841, 859 (1983). This can lead to exponential increases in the defendants&#8217; collective liability.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
<strong>LANDLORD TENANT LAWS</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Massachusetts law almost never favors landlords. Landlords are subject to a host of regulations under Massachusetts Sanitary Code, Building Code, local Noise Control Ordinances and strict laws protecting tenants security deposits and their quiet use and enjoyment. The warranty of habitability provides for strict liability for substantial violations of the state sanitary code, and G.L. ch. 186 sec. 14 provides for liability where landlords negligently or intentionally interfere with tenant&#8217;s quiet use and enjoyment. Ch. 186 sec. 14 provides for payment of the tenant&#8217;s reasonable attorney&#8217;s fees. The final kicker in most landlord tenant cases is that violations of either 186 sec. 14 or the warranty of habitability also subject landlords to liability under the Consumer Protection Act, ch. 93A, with its potential for multiple damages.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
<strong>FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Under both the federal and state false claims acts, whistleblowers can reap huge windfalls by helping the government to uncover fraudulent practices. In False Claims Act cases, whistleblowers can file suit on behalf of the government when they uncover fraud by state or federal contractors. For example, a typical <a href="http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2008/09/16/whistleblowers-get-10-million-for-medicaid-and-medicare-billing-fraud/">case</a> in New York, resulted in a doctor and a patient receiving 10 million dollars when they uncovered billing fraud by a nursing home. False Claims Act case often involve fraudulent billing of the defense department, fraudulent billing of the federal government for medicaid or medicare, and fraud by construction contractors on the state government. With its active defense industry, health care industry and state construction contracting industry, Massachusetts has a favorable environment for plaintiffs alleging violations of the False Claims Acts.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
<strong>FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ACT</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Massachusetts Anti-Discrimination Law, ch. 151B, provides unusually strong protection to employees who are subjected to discrimination. Ch. 151B has strict prohibitions against unequal treatment, harassment and retaliation, and it provides liberally for the payment of punitive damages and employee&#8217;s reasonable attorney&#8217;s fees. In cases of sexual and racial harassment by supervisors, employers are strictly liable. Massachusetts probably has the strongest anti-discrimination law in the world.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
<strong>WRONGFUL DEATH ACT</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Massachusetts Wrongful Death Act, ch. 229, sec. 2, protects one of the most important rights, the right not to be wrongfully deprived of life. Where defendants are negligent, it authorizes the recovery of a wide range of compensatory damages. Where defendants are engage in malicious, willful, wanton, reckless or grossly negligent conduct, punitive damages may be recovered.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
<strong>WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY</strong><br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Massachusetts consumers have strong protections against manufacturers, suppliers, distributors and retailers that put dangerously defective products into the stream of commerce. The warranty of merchantability gives consumers a right to sue for damages when the vehicles, drugs and other products that they purchase or use are dangerously defective. Violations of the warranty of merchantability are also considered to be violations of ch. 93A, the Consumer Protection Act.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2010/08/14/eight-favorable-laws-in-the-plaintiffs-toolbox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Statute Grants Right to Sue For Unlawful Harassment</title>
		<link>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2010/06/09/new-statute-grants-right-to-sue-for-unlawful-harassment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2010/06/09/new-statute-grants-right-to-sue-for-unlawful-harassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harrassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrabeelaw.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governor Deval Patrick recently signed G.L. ch. 258E into law with little fanfare. This statute has created an avenue for victims of harassment and stalking to obtain harassment prevention orders. Possibly of even greater significance, it has also given victims of harassment an important new right to sue for damages. Ch. 258E gives harassment victims [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Governor Deval Patrick recently signed G.L. ch. 258E into law with little fanfare.  This statute has created an avenue for victims of harassment and stalking to obtain harassment prevention orders.  Possibly of even greater significance, it has also given victims of harassment an important new right to sue for damages.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Ch. 258E gives harassment victims a right to damages, including compensatory damages, medical expenses and reasonable attorney&#8217;s fees.  Because the law is broadly worded, it may provide a new cause of action for many employees, tenants, consumers, debtors, crime victims and other individuals who have been victims of harassment.  Boston employment lawyer Lauren Craig Redmond suggests that &#8220;258E amounts to a vast and untapped area of employer liability because of its broad definition of harassment.&#8221; Under 258E, &#8220;harassment&#8221; includes: &#8220;3 or more acts of willful and malicious conduct aimed at a specific person committed with the intent to cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property and that does in fact cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property&#8221;<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Although sexual and racial harassment has long been illegal, employers previously could avoid liability for egregious but non-discriminatory instances of harassment. Until now, general acts of harassment were not actionable unless they violated other established laws. With the enactment of ch. 258E, employers are now potentially liable for a broad range of activities that were not previously unlawful.  Now, repeated verbal or physical conduct that threatens, intimidates, denigrates or shows hostility or aversion toward an individual will amount to unlawful harassment.   For example, an employer who repeatedly and loudly berates an employee publicly or in front of other employees might be subject to liability for unlawful non-discriminatory harassment.<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
There are a host of unanswered questions concerning the scope and application of ch. 258E that will need to be decided by the courts.   When can employers be held liable when their employees engage in harassment?  Will employers be subject to strict liability for harassment by managers and supervisors?  Will claims under ch. 258E be preempted by ch. 151B, Massachusetts anti-discrimination law?  Do the the parties have a right to trial by jury in disputes arising under ch. 258E?<br />
<span style="line-height: 150%;"><br />
Ch. 258E also establishes a mechanism for individuals who are subject to harassment to go to court and obtained a protective order.  These orders can restrain harassers from engaging in further acts of harassment and abuse and require harassers to keep a certain distance away from victims of harassment.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2010/06/09/new-statute-grants-right-to-sue-for-unlawful-harassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Execs In $500 Million Scam Receive Very Short Sentences</title>
		<link>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2009/05/05/execs-in-500-million-scam-receive-very-short-sentences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2009/05/05/execs-in-500-million-scam-receive-very-short-sentences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrabeelaw.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former executive at General Re Corp, who was deeply involved in a reinsurance scam that cost American International Group (AIG) shareholders $500 million, was sentenced on May 4, 2009 to 1 year in prison.  Robert Graham, the defendant, was the the associate general counsel at Gen Re &#8211; an attorney.  He helped to draft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A former executive at General Re Corp, who was deeply involved in a reinsurance scam that cost American International Group (AIG) shareholders $500 million, was sentenced on May 4, 2009 to 1 year in prison.  Robert Graham, the defendant, was the the associate general counsel at Gen Re &#8211; an attorney.  He helped to draft the documents that made the fraud possible.  Other Gen Re executives convicted of participating in the fraud after a jury trial received sentences in the range of 1 to 4 years.  It is unfortunate when the high and mighty are treated leniently while the lowly are severely punished.</p>
<p>Compare this with the case Angela  Thompson of New York, a 17 year old who sold 2 ounces of cocaine to an undercover police officer in the presence of her uncle.  Her sentence, of not less than 15 years to not more than 25 years, was upheld on appeal.  Although this case fell under state law, defendants arrested with even smaller amounts of crack cocaine routinely receive sentences of 5, 10 or even 20 years in prison in our federal courts.</p>
<p>Many workers and retirees have recently seen their retirement accounts decline by 40 to 50%, largely as a result of corporate crime and other misconduct.  Although we cannot allow street crime to proliferate, for most Americans, massive corporate crime is a greater threat than petty street crime.  For most people, its not the crime in the streets, its the crime in the corporate suites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2009/05/05/execs-in-500-million-scam-receive-very-short-sentences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Administration Officials Should Be Prosecuted</title>
		<link>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2009/02/05/bush-administration-officials-should-be-prosecuted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2009/02/05/bush-administration-officials-should-be-prosecuted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrabeelaw.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High officials in the Bush administration should be prosecuted for crimes that involved the torture of captives at Guantanamo, physical and sexual abuse of prisoners, illegal wiretapping, lying to Congress and extra-terratorial kidnappings.  Based on Pentagon investigations, publicly released documents, and admissions of other officials in the Bush Administration, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High officials in the Bush administration should be prosecuted for crimes that involved the torture of captives at Guantanamo, physical and sexual abuse of prisoners, illegal wiretapping, lying to Congress and extra-terratorial kidnappings.  Based on Pentagon investigations, publicly released documents, and admissions of other officials in the Bush Administration, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez,  Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo and other high officials in the Bush administration conspired to violate the Federal Civil Rights Act, 18, U.S.C. Section 242, the Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act, and treaties adopted by the United States, including the Geneva Conventions and the Convention Against Torture.  They should be prosecuted because holding these officials accountable will serve as a warning present and future officials, it will help to redeem the image of the United States overseas by demonstrating our commitment to the rule of law, and it will  demonstrate that the powerful can be held accountable when they commit enormous crimes just as the weak are held accountable for petty crimes.  Our new Attorney General,Eric H. Holder Jr., recently testified that “Waterboarding is torture”  and he acknowledged that “We prosecuted our own soldiers for using it in Vietnam.”  He noted that waterboarding had been used to torment prisoners during the Inquisition, by the Japanese in World War II and in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge.  If these high officials are permitted to violate the law with impunity, order the torture people held in secret prisons, illegally spy on American citizens and lie about their actions to Congress, our democracy and our freedom will be further eroded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2009/02/05/bush-administration-officials-should-be-prosecuted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whistleblowers Get $10 Million For Medicaid and Medicare Billing Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2008/09/16/whistleblowers-get-10-million-for-medicaid-and-medicare-billing-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2008/09/16/whistleblowers-get-10-million-for-medicaid-and-medicare-billing-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrabeelaw.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under federal and state false claims acts, whistleblowers can reap huge windfalls by helping the government to uncover fraudulent practices. In a recent New York case, a patient and a doctor in a whistleblower suit will receive a total of $9.9 million out of a settlement paid to the federal and state governments. New York&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under federal and state false claims acts, whistleblowers can reap huge windfalls by helping the government to uncover fraudulent practices.</p>
<p>In a recent New York case, a patient and a doctor in a whistleblower suit will receive a total of $9.9 million out of a settlement paid to the federal and state governments. New York&#8217;s Staten Island University Hospital will pay $88.9 million to settle allegations that it defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and a military insurance program.  According to the suit, the hospital intentionally used false billing codes to obtain reimbursement from Medicare.  The whistleblowers (legally referred to as “relators”) will receive about 10% of the total amount recovered for the government, even though they themselves suffered no losses.</p>
<p>The Massachusetts and Federal False Claims Act impose liability on companies that present false or fraudulent claims   to the government.</p>
<p>In the health care field, the following activities are examples of conduct prohibited by the false claims laws:</p>
<p>•  	Billing for services not actually provided;<br />
• 	Billing for undocumented services;<br />
• 	Making false entries in medical and other records used to support reimbursement;<br />
• 	Billing for medically unnecessary services;<br />
• 	Characterizing non-covered services or costs in a way that leads to reimbursement from a government program;<br />
• 	Assigning incorrect codes in order to obtain a higher reimbursement;<br />
• 	Making inaccurate, false or inappropriate entries on cost reports;<br />
• 	Failing to seek payment from beneficiaries who may have other primary payment sources;<br />
• 	Participating in kickbacks, bribes, or rebates in exchange for referring goods, facilities, services, or items that are reimbursed by government programs.</p>
<p>A violation of the Federal False Claims Act may result in penalties of up to $11,000 per false claim plus three times the amount of damages the government sustains, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Individuals, including employees, can bring a civil action on behalf of the Federal government for violations of the Federal False Claims Act. In return, the individual may share a percentage of any monetary recovery or settlement.   Generally, individuals who bring the actions receive between 10% and 30% of the amount recovered.</p>
<p>The Massachusetts and Federal False Claims Acts prohibit employers from retaliating against any employee by discharging, demoting, harassing, or otherwise discriminating against him because he has reported violations of the False Claims Acts. This prohibition is what is generally referred to as “whistleblower” protection. If an employee experiences prohibited retaliation, he or she is entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole such as reinstatement, two times back pay, interest, emotional distress damages, costs, and attorney&#8217;s fees.</p>
<p>Whistleblower statutes give employees an incentive to report fraud on the government and protections from retaliaton.  Otherwise, employees with information about government fraud would not step forward because they would lose their jobs.</p>
<p>If you have information about a potential false claim, you should contact an attorney promptly and keep it a secret.  Only the first whistleblower(s) to file suit gets to share in the recovery, and whistleblowers don&#8217;t get a share of the recovery if the fraud becomes public knowledge before suit is filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2008/09/16/whistleblowers-get-10-million-for-medicaid-and-medicare-billing-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About The Corporate Liability Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2008/09/01/lorem-ipsum-dolor-sit-amet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2008/09/01/lorem-ipsum-dolor-sit-amet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Misconduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrabeelaw.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We created The Corporate Liability Blog to provide information that is helpful to plaintiffs and their attorneys who are working to hold corporations accountable when they violate the law. We will soon be regularly posting commentary, important documents, and links to useful websites and blogs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We created The Corporate Liability Blog to provide information that is helpful to plaintiffs and their attorneys who are working to hold corporations accountable when they violate the law.  We will soon be regularly posting commentary, important documents, and links to useful websites and blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrabeelaw.com/2008/09/01/lorem-ipsum-dolor-sit-amet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

